For many years, The Fool has made a habit of pondering weighty philosophical issues such as "How does one find one's bliss?", "Is it better to have low expectations or high ones?", and "Is this 72-oz. Big Gulp I'm holding half-empty or simply far bigger than I needed to be drinking?".Recently, The Fool's mental spotlight has begun to shine its mighty illumination onto the topic of liberalism v. conservatism. It's a secret that he doesn't like to discuss too openly, but The Fool was once a political conservative. As a Young Republican, The Fool protested for the U.S. to be *in* El Salvador and deplored the corrosive influence of unions on the state of American Industry. The Fool even wrote a thesis on Margaret Thatcher's economic policies. (And he still admires the venerable Iron Lady, even though we've taken different personal paths. She had bigger cojones than 99% of the men The Fool knows.)
Over the years, however, The Fool has become more moderate and now openly calls himself "liberal" or "progressive". (The Fool is cautious. In some Southern dialects, "liberal" is translated as "half-brained, slack-jawed, drooling moron that believes anything the dang liberal media feeds ya and probably is vegetarian, too, and no you cain't have my gun".)
But, having once actively embraced both sides of the dialog, The Fool continues to search for that defining distinction between conservative and liberal.
- Desire to cling to the past v. Looking towards the future?
- Unwillingness to embrace change v. Desire for change?
- Have v. have-not?
- Patriotic (nationalistic) v. Citizen of the world?
The Fool believes that none of these capture the essence of the distinction. There are plenty of conservatives that envision a better future while there are many liberals that are well-off.
No, The Fool believes that the critical distinction lies in the breadth of one's worldview: "Me" v. "We". The conservative perspective focuses almost exclusively on the individual - survival of the fittest (ironically) where the winners make the rules and the losers have nothing. Personal effort generates its own rewards and if you aren't at the top of the heap, then you must not have worked hard enough and you deserve your empty stomach and foreclosed home.
The progressive worldview tends to be less bloodthirsty and more inclusive. Liberals recognize that we rise or fall together as a society, that helping our fellows also helps us, that what makes our society stronger makes all of us stronger. More broadly, a tide that benefits people of all nations raises all our boats. (And, no, imposing Democracy at gunpoint doesn't count.) Progressives believes that it's not all about tradeoffs, but that the curve can be extended. Everyone can have enough to eat and reasonably priced healthcare and a modest roof over their heads.
At the very least, The Fool understands this is what was behind his own philosophical switch - a recognition that we're all in this life together, that whatever helps one of us makes us all better, and that when we lose someone, it diminishes us all. (Sorry, Maggie.) Bong bong bong....

